<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; Keywords</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nehmedia.com/tag/keywords/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nehmedia.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:06:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google Caffeine vs. Google Decaf- Do They Taste the Same?</title>
		<link>http://blog.nehmedia.com/google/google-caffeinated/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nehmedia.com/google/google-caffeinated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lauren Eynon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decaf Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Caffeine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indexing System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Cutts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nehmedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp2.dev2.nehmedia.com/?p=518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Caffeine is getting quite a bit of buzz lately. It seems as if everyone is talking about what it is and what it will mean for the future of search. Google invited “power-searchers”  (or interested regular searchers) to test drive the new indexing system at www2.sandbox.google.com.
Even with the public testing and feedback there is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Caffeine is getting quite a bit of buzz lately. It seems as if everyone is talking about what it is and what it will mean for the future of search. Google invited “power-searchers”  (or interested regular searchers) to test drive the new indexing system at <a href="http://www2.sandbox.google.com/">www2.sandbox.</a><a href="http://www2.sandbox.google.com/"><strong>google</strong></a><a href="http://www2.sandbox.google.com/">.com</a>.</p>
<p>Even with the public testing and feedback there is still some mystery surrounding how far this new indexing system will go- will it be limited to search, or will it be applied across all of the Google online structure? For, now we don’t have those answers but we do know what Caffeine is and how it will change (or not change) your search results. </p>
<p>Google has stressed the fact that most users (i.e regular users) won’t notice any major differences- even though these changes are major (MAJOR). In fact, Caffeine basically is  a complete and total re-write of Google’s indexing system. The motivation behind these changes is to give the searcher, &#8212; power or regular, &#8212;  a much better overall search experience. Caffeine will give you faster, more accurate, and more comprehensive results- at least those are the goals. </p>
<p>If you go to <a href="http://www2.sandbox.google.com/">www2.sandbox.</a><a href="http://www2.sandbox.google.com/"><strong>google</strong></a><a href="http://www2.sandbox.google.com/">.com </a>and give Caffeine a spin (like I did)  you will notice some of these goals have already been met. I entered “Nehmedia” (of course) as my search term and my results returned within .05 seconds- I also tested this on Decaf Google (aka www.google.com) and my results were returned in .08 seconds. I also tried a more frequently searched term “Shoes;” Caffeine returned the results in .18 seconds and Decaf Google returned my results in .23. Conclusion: Caffeine is faster than the Google we use today. </p>
<p>Another interesting aspect of Google Caffeine is that this new indexing system is going to make your time from launch to index much quicker,.Meaning: the time between when you submit a document to be indexed and the time it is made searchable should be much shorter- which is pretty fantastic for those of us in SEO.</p>
<p>Also very important to note from the SEO standpoint is that it seems (to me at least) that a lot more emphasis is going to be put on keywords. The top results have the <strong>exact</strong> words you searched for and in the order you searched them in.</p>
<p>More emphasis is also put on recent activity and content. When I searched my name on Caffeine, the Facebook results were at the top. In Decaf Google, the top results were a mix of articles containing my name. I can only deduce from this that websites with more recent activity are pushed to the top of the results. This could have a huge impact on SEO; if we want our clients websites to be highly ranked we are going to need to regularly add content or make changes to the site. Caffeine will also return more search results than normal Google so your search becomes more comprehensive- they are making it very hard <em>not</em> to find what you are looking for. News is changing as well. Caffeine focuses on real-time updates and has set in place an algorithm to make sure that as news is updated, so are you. </p>
<p>Many people have been wondering what set Caffeine into motion and a lot of whispers (and yells in some cases) have been speculating that it was the recent Yahoo-Microsoft merger. Not so, says <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/">Matt Cutts</a> (and he would know). In fact, according to Cutts, Caffeine has been in the works for months and the timing is coincidence.</p>
<p>I believe him. It would have been nothing short of a miracle for engineers and technologists to have created this as a reaction to BingHoo (or whatever you want to call it) and have it up and ready for testing so quickly. Pretty impossible, even for Google. Nevertheless, it is competition- and fierce competition at that. Even if it wasn’t meant as an answer to the merger, it is an answer to it. </p>
<p>For regular searchers, Caffeine won’t mean too much of a difference in results. As Cutts said, the changes are “primarily under the hood”.  Google will still return relevant results- just faster and more comprehensive results. Power searchers and those in the “know” will notice some significant changes though, and SEO needs to take note of them because it will effect our methods and strategies.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Matt Cutts blog: <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nehmedia.com/google/google-caffeinated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#039;t Listen to the Words You&#039;ve Heard</title>
		<link>http://blog.nehmedia.com/keyword-research/dont-listen-to-the-words-youve-heard/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nehmedia.com/keyword-research/dont-listen-to-the-words-youve-heard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 02:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lauren Eynon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Keyword Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Page Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keyword Stuffing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keyword Tool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Volume]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website Content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp2.dev2.nehmedia.com/?p=236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Words. Every word has a definition, a meaning that is finite. Right?  Wrong. In the world of SEO (Search Engine Optimization) words mean so much more than their definitions, which is why we call them &#8220;keywords&#8221;- because they are key. The right keywords can take a website from lost in space to mission accomplished. It&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Words. Every word has a definition, a meaning that is finite. Right?  Wrong. In the world of SEO (Search Engine Optimization) words mean so much more than their definitions, which is why we call them <a href="http://www.nehmedia.com/services/keyword-targeting">&#8220;keywords&#8221;</a>- because they are key. The right keywords can take a website from lost in space to mission accomplished. It&#8217;s all a matter of choosing the right words for your site. Much thought and process should be put into this decision, you have to consider your customer base, keyword search volumes, if those keywords have performed well over several years or only just recently, what the connotations of that word are&#8230; there is quite a bit to think about before deciding. This is one of the reasons using <a href="http://www.nehmedia.com/services/tools-that-simplify">keyword tools</a> can be so helpful, they take loads and loads of data and present it in a way that makes it clear what words to use in your site.</p>
<p>Once you have made those decisions its all just a matter of working it into the content of your site, right? Wrong.  You have to be careful here, using these keywords is incredibly important but incorporating them in a meaningful and logical way is essential. If a Search Engine (especially if that Search Engine is Google) believes that your site is &#8220;keyword stuffing&#8221; &#8211; meaning you are using keywords that are not relevant to your site or that you are using relevant keywords that are repeated too often in a nonsensical way throughout your site,then those Search Engines will take you completely off the grid and all that keyword research was for naught. There are many components that go into creating a successful and highly ranked website but choosing the right keywords can take you pretty far down the road. The lesson? Don&#8217;t listen to the words you&#8217;ve heard, listen to the words that rank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nehmedia.com/keyword-research/dont-listen-to-the-words-youve-heard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
