<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; Yahoo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nehmedia.com/tag/yahoo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nehmedia.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:06:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google Caffeine vs. Google Decaf- Do They Taste the Same?</title>
		<link>http://blog.nehmedia.com/google/google-caffeinated/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nehmedia.com/google/google-caffeinated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lauren Eynon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decaf Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Caffeine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indexing System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Cutts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nehmedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp2.dev2.nehmedia.com/?p=518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Caffeine is getting quite a bit of buzz lately. It seems as if everyone is talking about what it is and what it will mean for the future of search. Google invited “power-searchers”  (or interested regular searchers) to test drive the new indexing system at www2.sandbox.google.com.
Even with the public testing and feedback there is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Caffeine is getting quite a bit of buzz lately. It seems as if everyone is talking about what it is and what it will mean for the future of search. Google invited “power-searchers”  (or interested regular searchers) to test drive the new indexing system at <a href="http://www2.sandbox.google.com/">www2.sandbox.</a><a href="http://www2.sandbox.google.com/"><strong>google</strong></a><a href="http://www2.sandbox.google.com/">.com</a>.</p>
<p>Even with the public testing and feedback there is still some mystery surrounding how far this new indexing system will go- will it be limited to search, or will it be applied across all of the Google online structure? For, now we don’t have those answers but we do know what Caffeine is and how it will change (or not change) your search results. </p>
<p>Google has stressed the fact that most users (i.e regular users) won’t notice any major differences- even though these changes are major (MAJOR). In fact, Caffeine basically is  a complete and total re-write of Google’s indexing system. The motivation behind these changes is to give the searcher, &#8212; power or regular, &#8212;  a much better overall search experience. Caffeine will give you faster, more accurate, and more comprehensive results- at least those are the goals. </p>
<p>If you go to <a href="http://www2.sandbox.google.com/">www2.sandbox.</a><a href="http://www2.sandbox.google.com/"><strong>google</strong></a><a href="http://www2.sandbox.google.com/">.com </a>and give Caffeine a spin (like I did)  you will notice some of these goals have already been met. I entered “Nehmedia” (of course) as my search term and my results returned within .05 seconds- I also tested this on Decaf Google (aka www.google.com) and my results were returned in .08 seconds. I also tried a more frequently searched term “Shoes;” Caffeine returned the results in .18 seconds and Decaf Google returned my results in .23. Conclusion: Caffeine is faster than the Google we use today. </p>
<p>Another interesting aspect of Google Caffeine is that this new indexing system is going to make your time from launch to index much quicker,.Meaning: the time between when you submit a document to be indexed and the time it is made searchable should be much shorter- which is pretty fantastic for those of us in SEO.</p>
<p>Also very important to note from the SEO standpoint is that it seems (to me at least) that a lot more emphasis is going to be put on keywords. The top results have the <strong>exact</strong> words you searched for and in the order you searched them in.</p>
<p>More emphasis is also put on recent activity and content. When I searched my name on Caffeine, the Facebook results were at the top. In Decaf Google, the top results were a mix of articles containing my name. I can only deduce from this that websites with more recent activity are pushed to the top of the results. This could have a huge impact on SEO; if we want our clients websites to be highly ranked we are going to need to regularly add content or make changes to the site. Caffeine will also return more search results than normal Google so your search becomes more comprehensive- they are making it very hard <em>not</em> to find what you are looking for. News is changing as well. Caffeine focuses on real-time updates and has set in place an algorithm to make sure that as news is updated, so are you. </p>
<p>Many people have been wondering what set Caffeine into motion and a lot of whispers (and yells in some cases) have been speculating that it was the recent Yahoo-Microsoft merger. Not so, says <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/">Matt Cutts</a> (and he would know). In fact, according to Cutts, Caffeine has been in the works for months and the timing is coincidence.</p>
<p>I believe him. It would have been nothing short of a miracle for engineers and technologists to have created this as a reaction to BingHoo (or whatever you want to call it) and have it up and ready for testing so quickly. Pretty impossible, even for Google. Nevertheless, it is competition- and fierce competition at that. Even if it wasn’t meant as an answer to the merger, it is an answer to it. </p>
<p>For regular searchers, Caffeine won’t mean too much of a difference in results. As Cutts said, the changes are “primarily under the hood”.  Google will still return relevant results- just faster and more comprehensive results. Power searchers and those in the “know” will notice some significant changes though, and SEO needs to take note of them because it will effect our methods and strategies.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Matt Cutts blog: <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nehmedia.com/google/google-caffeinated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEOM? Search Engine Optimization Marketing&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.nehmedia.com/page-optimization/seom-search-engine-optimization-marketing/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nehmedia.com/page-optimization/seom-search-engine-optimization-marketing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lauren Eynon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Page Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Algorithms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competitive Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keyword Tool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optimized Keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay-Per-Click]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Volume]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEOM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp2.dev2.nehmedia.com/?p=504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, I realize that SEOM is not an industry term (unless you are a part of the industry that defines it as Spectral Element Ocean Model…but if you are here, then I doubt it). I do, however, think it should be an SEO term. Search Engine Optimization Marketing, has a very nice ring to it- [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I realize that SEOM is not an industry term (unless you are a part of the industry that defines it as Spectral Element Ocean Model…but if you are here, then I doubt it). I do, however, think it should be an SEO term. Search Engine Optimization Marketing, has a very nice ring to it- and more importantly a relevance.</p>
<p>As search engine algorithms become more advanced and people are less and less able to function without an internet connection, SEO has to become more sophisticated. We can’t completely rely on the “old faithful” strategies. Of course, <a href="http://www.nehmedia.com/services/keyword-targeting">optimized keywords</a>, <a href="http://www.nehmedia.com/services/content-strategy">valuable content</a>, <a href=" http://www.nehmedia.com/services/smarter-ppc">PPC (Pay-Per-Click)</a>, and linking are all still vital for a successful website- but they aren’t alone anymore. A focused marketing strategy is quickly becoming one of the most crucial aspects of creating and launching a successful website.</p>
<p>Hence, SEOM- Search Engine Optimization Marketing. What I mean to say by this is that using traditional methods of SEO are no longer enough. These days a strategic marketing plan is going to be the difference between a site some people visit and a site that is well-known. A couple things to keep in mind when formulating a marketing plan for a website…</p>
<p> </p>
<p>* Audience- What is the audience you are trying to attract? What type of keywords does that audience respond to? This is where your SEO <a href="http://www.nehmedia.com/services/tools-that-simplify">keyword tools</a> come into play. They will help you decide on keywords and give you the statistics on those keywords including the all-important search volume information (if there is no search volume, there are no searchers, and you need a new idea for a website). It is vital to think about your audience, if you create a site without keeping them in mind then you might as well have not created a site at all. Remember, even if you rank number one on a search engine doesn’t mean that searchers will like your site, and if they don’t, they will move on to whomever is number two.</p>
<ul>
<li>Testing- if you think you have an amazing idea for a website but aren’t sure if it will be popular then test it out. This is where <a href="http://www.nehmedia.com/services/smarter-ppc">PPC (Pay-Per-Click) </a>can come in handy- if you have the funds. Create a few PPC ads describing your potential site and launch them. If you find your ads are getting loads of clicks, then chances are your potential website will be popular as well. If not, then maybe re-think your idea. </li>
<li>PPC can be a really great way of finding out what types of sites people are interested in visiting and what sites they aren’t. Try a couple different ads to see which earns the most clicks. A note of warning: yes,PPC is awesome and helpful, but it is also expensive. So keep an eye on your daily budgets and when you have enough data to draw a conclusion, consider trying for organic optimization on the keywords that are working for you. </li>
<li> <a href="http://www.nehmedia.com/services/competitive-insights">Competitive Analysis</a>- Who else is occupying the space you want? How well do they do it? Are you trying to push your way into a space where there isn’t any room? For example, maybe you have a brilliant idea for a new search engine… well, that’s gonna be an uphill climb! Google owns (I mean OWNS) that space, and if something cataclysmic happened and they no longer ruled then Yahoo, Bing, Ask.com, and many others are queued up to take the top spot.</li>
<li>You absolutely have to consider your competitors. If you want to compete in a space that already has a household name, then you might want to consider another idea. On the other hand, if you have a creative or niche idea for a site then it is probably worth proceeding. You just need to have put in the research and analysis into your competitor sites so your website can beat them not only at the ranking but also at popularity. Any decent marketer worth his pricey suit would tell you that in order to compete you have to know the market inside and out- and the same is true online. </li>
</ul>
<p>SEO works really well. SEO works better when paired with a focused marketing strategy. It isn’t all about rank (and it truly pains me to say that); it is also about what your audience likes and responds to. You might be the best-optimized site on the internet, but if searchers don’t like your site, they won’t visit and you will have a top ranked mess on your hands. At the end of the day, it’s about getting searchers to come and stay on your site, and that takes a solid marketing strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nehmedia.com/page-optimization/seom-search-engine-optimization-marketing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are You Smarter than a Search Engine?</title>
		<link>http://blog.nehmedia.com/google/are-you-smarter-than-a-search-engine/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nehmedia.com/google/are-you-smarter-than-a-search-engine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 20:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lauren Eynon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expert SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masked Keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonscript Tags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optimized Keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Optimization Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Rank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spiders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp2.dev2.nehmedia.com/?p=443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The short answer is no. However, this hasn&#8217;t stopped thousands of websites from trying to outwit Google, MSN, and Yahoo. It can be very tempting to take short cuts on the road to higher search engine rank- very tempting- and very foolish. Search Engine&#8217;s have the most skilled professionals and advanced technologies monitoring websites specifically [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The short answer is no. However, this hasn&#8217;t stopped thousands of websites from trying to outwit Google, MSN, and Yahoo. It can be very tempting to take short cuts on the road to higher search engine rank- very tempting- and very foolish. Search Engine&#8217;s have the most skilled professionals and advanced technologies monitoring websites specifically to prevent being cheated. There can be no doubt about it, no matter how intelligent you are or how cleverly you have hidden content or keywords to achieve higher rank, Search Engines will discover you and they will make your website disappear in a matter of minutes.</p>
<p>There are some who would have you believe that all top ranked sites cheat in order to be number one. This couldn&#8217;t be farther from the truth. Websites with top ranking are at the top because they employ expert SEO companies that use Search Optimization Software. They have <a href="http://www.nehmedia.com/services/keyword-targeting">optimized keywords</a>, and <a href="http://www.nehmedia.com/services/content-strategy">quality content</a>- that is why they are highly ranked. Be this as it may, there are still plenty of people trying to cheat the system. Some use masked keywords to achieve a (very) short term ranking. Masked keywords are words that you have incorporated into your website that don&#8217;t actually have any relevance to what the site is actually about. Some instances of this are using celebrity names, political events, or top news headlines in order to lure people to your site. This will probably work for a very short while, but all those customers visiting the site weren&#8217;t actually looking for it in the first place and were only attracted to it because of misleading keywords- they will leave your site immediately and never return. However, losing face with customers will be the least of your worries, because when a Search Engine discovers you have been cheating them, they will ban your site from all search, permanently.</p>
<p>Another popular method of scamming (and it is a scam) Search Engines is using noscript tags to hide content that the customer doesn&#8217;t see but the Search Engines do. Noscript tags are supposed to be used for alternate content in the event your site content doesn&#8217;t appear or a script is not executed. Instead of properly using noscript tags some websites fill them with high ranking keywords/content that has absolutely nothing to do with their site. The Search Engines spiderbots read this content and assign the site a high rank- at first- it doesn&#8217;t take long for the bots to recognize the farce and immediately erase the website from memory. Let me stress there is no coming back from this, no excuse in the world will save you from being banned. If you cheat a Search Engine, they will enforce the harshest of consequences- without asking questions.</p>
<p>The lesson? Do not even attempt to fool a Search Engine. You won&#8217;t ever be able to outsmart them and the repercussions could be devastating to your business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nehmedia.com/google/are-you-smarter-than-a-search-engine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
